Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Over Forty Age Group
D P Johnson
The aim of this study was to analyse the use of a bone-patella tendon-bone
autograft for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligaments in
patients with persistent instability and restricted function over the
age of 40 years. A prospective review of utilising an arthroscopic assisted
technique, utilising a 10mm autograft secured with Interference Fit Screws.
A consecutive group of 14 patients over the age of 40 years at the time
of surgery was compared with a concurrent series of 50 patients under
the age of 40. Regular post-operative clinical and radiological review
was undertaken. Objective laxity testing was undertaken by one observer
using a standard protocol.
The mean age of this population was 44 years (range 40 to 51 years).
Follow up was obtained in all patients for a mean 19 months. This group
of patients was compared with a group of 43 consecutive patients mean
age 29 years. The results demonstrated that all patients over the age
of 40 obtained subjective and objective stability of their knee. When
asked 98% under the age and 100% of patients over the age of 40 considered
their knee to be good or excellent. One patient under the age of 40 had
clinical giving way and a failed graft. Clinical laxity measurement using
the KT1000 Dynamometer demonstrated a normal laxity of less than 3mm in
91% of patients under the age of 40 and 100% of patients over the age
of 40. 2% of patients under the age of 40 had a measurement of greater
than 5 mm, confirming a ruptured graft. Clinical analysis demonstrated
all patients in the group over 40 to have a negative pivot shift compared
with 7% of patients under the age of 40 having an abnormal pivot shift
examination. Analysis of the pre and post operative Lysholm score demonstrated
an improvement in both groups. International Knee Documentation Committee
Scoring analysis demonstrated a normal or nearly normal score in 93% of
patients under the age of 40 compared with 100% of patients over the age
of 40.
In conclusion we would suggest that these patients were able to undertake
a normal rehabilitation and obtain a full range of motion. Utilising this
graft resulted in excellent subjective and objective stability. Anterior
knee pain was only present in 7% of patients and not associated with any
restriction in function. Although none of the patients in this group required
reconstruction for posterio-lateral rotary instability or for excessive
varus, these factors must be considered prior to undertaking reconstruction
in this population.
|